1,342 Athletes Exit Khelo India Programme in Three Years: Government Clarifies

The Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya, responding in the Rajya Sabha, revealed that 1,342 athletes have exited the Khelo India programme over the last three years.

Why Were They Removed

According to the Minister, athletes were removed after falling below prescribed performance benchmarks. Some exits were also due to anti-doping rule violations.

This action forms part of a structured performance review mechanism embedded within the Khelo India system.

What This Means

Performance-Based System

Khelo India operates on a benchmark-driven model where athletes are required to maintain defined performance standards, demonstrate measurable improvement, and meet periodic evaluation criteria.

Athletes who consistently fail to meet targets are replaced by emerging talents, ensuring competitive renewal within the system.

Zero Tolerance on Doping

The government has emphasized strict action against anti-doping violations and ethical misconduct. This reflects India's growing commitment to a clean sport culture, particularly in view of long-term Olympic ambitions.

Bigger Picture

Khelo India was launched to identify grassroots talent, provide scholarships of 6.28 lakh rupees per athlete per year, and offer structured coaching, sports science support, and competition exposure.

While selected athletes receive comprehensive support, continuation in the programme depends on merit, discipline, and sustained performance.

The exit of 1,342 athletes does not necessarily indicate weakness in the scheme. Instead, it reflects performance accountability, competitive filtering, and continuous talent refreshment.

Strategic Context

India is aligning its sports ecosystem toward the Olympic Vision 2036, focusing on high-performance pathways, scientific training systems, and transparent athlete monitoring.

Regular evaluation ensures that public funds are used efficiently, only competitive athletes continue to receive central support, and new emerging talents are given opportunities.

Key Takeaway

The government's stance sends a clear message. Support is assured, but performance and integrity are non-negotiable.

For coaches and academies, this highlights the importance of long-term athlete monitoring, clean sport education, structured performance progression planning, and psychological support systems.

Author

Dr C Ajithkumar
International Athletics Coach